A Chain of National Newspapers' AI-Generated Reading List Features Fake Books, Highlighting the Importance of Human Editors
A Chain of National Newspapers' AI-Generated Reading List Features Fake Books, Highlighting the Importance of Human Editors

Published: May 21, 2025

A recent summer reading list published by a chain of national newspapers has sparked controversy after it was revealed that the list was partially generated by AI and featured fake books. The incident has raised concerns about the limitations of AI and the importance of human touch in editing and journalism.

The Fake Reading List

The summer reading list, which was published in major national newspapers such as The Chicago Sun-Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer, featured 15 books, only five of which were real. The list included fake books by famous authors, including Percival Everett, Isabelle Allende, and Taylor Jenkins Reid.

The journalist responsible for the mistake, Marco Buscaglia, has taken full responsibility for the mistake, stating that he had used AI to generate the list and had not properly vetted the information.

The Importance of Human Editors

The incident has highlighted the importance of human editors in the journalism industry. While AI can be useful in generating ideas and assisting with research, it is not a replacement for human critical thinking and judgment.

As Lizz Schumer, senior books editor at PEOPLE, notes, "AI is good at a lot of things, but this is a great example of how badly things can go wrong when humans turn over the controls entirely."

Schumer adds that while AI can be useful in brainstorming headline wording and working out tricky transitions, it should not be relied upon to do the work of human editors.

The Limitations of AI

The incident has also highlighted the limitations of AI and its ability to understand nuance and context. As Schumer notes, "People still know what other people want better than any machine. That's the unique specialty of subject-matter experts like myself and my colleagues here at PEOPLE."

The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of AI in journalism and the importance of human critical thinking and judgment in the industry.

This incident serves as a reminder that while AI can be useful tools, they should not be relied upon to replace human critical thinking and judgment. As Schumer notes, "Working with AI as an assistant is one thing; expecting it to do our work for us is another."

The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of AI in journalism and the importance of human critical thinking and judgment in the industry.